Sep 272013
 

Obama gave an awesome speech today – informative, persuasive, and funny.

Obamacare (the Affordable Care Act) is basically just a way to channel uninsured people into a group plan so collectively they can spread risk and negotiate lower prices. It’s a conservative approach to universal healthcare: the care providers and even the health insurance providers remain in the private sector. The federal government’s role is basically just establishing a marketplace to connect consumers to health insurance that’s right for them.

If you don’t have time to watch the video, just go straight to healthcare.gov and check out the program yourself. This TUE OCT 1, that site will direct you to an user-friendly resource tailored to your state where you’ll be able to shop for affordable health insurance.

 Posted by on September 27, 2013
Sep 192013
 

Dan Barker was a fundamentalist minister, and a hardcore one at that. For many years he toured North America, convinced Christ would return any day and the world would end, trying to save as many souls as he could in the time remaining. Gradually he made his way to atheism. I just came across his 2010 speech to the Global Atheist Convention in Melbourne. He’s a great speaker and his story is compelling.

My favorite quote from the speech:

If the prodigal son is a parable and Adam and Eve are a metaphor then maybe God himself is just one huge figure of speech….
There’s no evidence for a god.
There’s no good arguments for a god.
There’s no coherent definition of a god.
There’s no good replies to the arguments against a god.
There’s no need for a god.

Check it out:

 Posted by on September 19, 2013
Aug 292013
 

I mean it’s literally expensive.

Poor people obviously have less money than rich people. What’s not so obvious is that things cost more for them. And they have extra expenses that rich people don’t have.

When you’re poor, you can’t afford to buy high quality things that actually work and that last. So instead you pay the ongoing cost of continually repairing or replacing your crappy stuff, which ends up being more expensive in the long run. From clothes to washing machines to cars to towels to flooring, you get cheapo stuff that turns out not to be cheap at all.

You’re more likely to use a credit card to pay for big ticket items, so not only do you pay full retail, your interest payments increase your overall costs considerably. (Rich people get significant discounts by paying in cash and they never have to pay interest.) And you can’t afford to buy in bulk, so you pay more per unit than wealthier people. The Washington Post reports that poor people actually pay more for groceries than rich people – not just because they can’t afford to buy in bulk, but also because the stores in their neighborhoods actually charge more.

You can’t afford a Cadillac health-care plan. You’re lucky if you can afford the bottom-of-the-barrel plan with much higher deductibles. If you ever have a real health crisis, your sucky plan leaves you footing much more of the bill. Many poor people cannot afford health insurance at all, which means a health crisis results in mind boggling levels of debt and often in bankruptcy.

You’re less likely to have the time and money to do the things that maintain your health. You can’t afford a fancy gym membership (even if you had time to work out). You can’t afford healthy food so instead you eat crap that makes you sick. You can’t afford biannual teeth cleanings so instead your teeth rot, and then when you finally go to the dentist the bills are outrageous.

If you don’t have enough money to maintain the minimum balance, then instead of your bank paying you interest on your checking account, the bank charges you monthly fees. It can be difficult to predict when these fees will be subtracted from your balance, so you’re more likely to bounce checks. Bouncing checks incurs even more fees. As Matthew Yglesias at Slate points out, poor people are also forced to pay fees to use ATMs. These fees are waived for wealthier customers.

Your credit usually isn’t great, so your credit cards charge exorbitant interest rates. You’re never offered gold or platinum memberships in anything, never receive perks, never accrue sky miles. You can’t afford membership so you don’t receive the sale prices offered to members. You’re constantly paying fines and late fees that keep you from getting ahead. You cannot leverage your money because you can’t get loans. If you can get a loan, you’ll pay a higher interest rate than anybody else.

You rent rather than own because renting is more affordable, and so each month you help your landlord turn a profit instead of helping yourself build equity.

I support capitalism. The alternatives to it have so far proved inferior. But the division of our society into economic classes that have nothing to do with work ethic or merit seems pretty unfair to me. And it’s uncool that our economic system is geared to kick you when you’re down.

 Posted by on August 29, 2013
Aug 222013
 

This dude is cool.

Mike Aus was a Lutheran pastor in Texas who began having doubts about his faith. He eventually made the decision to leave it, which must’ve been incredibly difficult since as a pastor leaving his faith meant also leaving his job, his social network, and his sense of identity, and disappointing his peers, his congregation, and his family. He came out as an atheist in an interview on MSNBC in 2012. He writes an excellent blog, which I just discovered today. I’m enjoying catching up on his blog posts. His thoughts on prophets, faith, the Bible, and irreligious morality resonate with things I’ve written in Merrily Dancing Ape. As an ex-pastor trained in theology, he knows a ton about the Bible and has a fascinating perspective.

Check out the following talk he gave to the Humanists of Houston:

More stories about pastors transitioning from religion to free-thought can be found over at the Clergy Project.

 Posted by on August 22, 2013
May 022013
 

O ye people of West Oahu, hear me!

Have you noticed your morning commute becoming SUPER CRAPPY over the past few months? You know why it’s happening, don’t you?

They’re building new track houses in Kapolei. They’re building new track houses in Makakilo. They’re building new track houses in Ewa. Building, building, building!

DR Horton and Castle & Cooke construct lovely houses – houses with lovely cultured marble counter tops in the bathroom, lovely Corian solid surface counters in the kitchen, and lovely views into your neighbor’s lovely kitchen across your lovely postage stamp sized yard.

The houses in themselves are fine. They lack character, but they’re nice places to live for the people who own them. The problem is what is sacrificed in order to build them. These new homes result in less open space on the island, and more congestion in Makakilo, Kapolei, Ewa, and on the H-1.

It’s a tragedy that the city planning on Oahu is so abysmal and that our elected leaders are so in bed with the developers. Tens of thousands of new houses are slated for construction. All of us on the Leeward side still share the same one highway, the H-1. There is no room to expand the H-1 or to build another road. The H-1 already boasts the second worse traffic in the nation. Adding new homes adds new people to the island and new cars to the road, which diminishes the quality of life for people who already live here.

More lamentation below the fold.

Continue reading »

Apr 172013
 

There’s a new diet fad based upon the writings of Michael Pollan. Pollan is the author of The Omnivore’s Dilemma, In Defense of Food, and Food Rules. (Michael Pollan is a smart dude but someday maybe I’ll post why I, as a vegetarian, had some big problems with The Omnivore’s Dilemma.)

The 100-Days-of-Real-Food diet website is here: 100DaysOfRealFood.com

The rules of the diet are pretty straightforward:

Stick to fruit, vegetables, whole grains, dairy products, meat, and “whole foods that are more a product of nature than a product of industry.” Abstain from refined ingredients, artificial sweeteners, processed food, fast food, and fried food.

The three trickiest rules, quoted directly from the 100-Days website, are these:

  1. No refined grains such as white flour or white rice (items containing wheat must say WHOLE wheat…not just “wheat”)
  2. No refined sweeteners such as sugar, any form of corn syrup, cane juice, or the artificial stuff like Splenda
  3. Nothing out of a box, can, bag, bottle or package that has more than 5 ingredients listed on the label

Seems simple enough, right?

Not for me! I decided to give the diet a 5 day trial. It was an abysmal failure. But I learned some interesting lessons. My day-by-day experience and conclusion about the diet are below the fold.

Continue reading »

Feb 222013
 

Some time ago I signed a petition on the “We the People” Whitehouse website. The petition was titled, “Require free access over the Internet to scientific journal articles arising from taxpayer-funded research.” Today the Obama administration responded:

The Obama Administration agrees that citizens deserve easy access to the results of research their tax dollars have paid for.

Pretty cool! More on the official response below the fold…

Continue reading »

 Posted by on February 22, 2013
Feb 212013
 

Most of modern science fiction is chock full of violence and war. I like a good lightsaber duel, a showdown with laser riffles, or an epic battle between fleets of space ships, just as much as the next sci-fi fan. But I’ve realized that most of our science fiction today is merely a reflection of our current age and our current values, and therefore fails to provide any insights into what the future might really be like.

The science fiction of Jules Verne was different. Verne was able to think outside the box of his age, and so he was able to produce sci-fi with actual predictive power. Gene Roddenberry, too. Star Trek predicted cell phones, microwave ovens, tablet PCs, various medical devices, and racial equality.

What do you think the future will be like? I’ll make a few guesses:

1. Space Battles

There will never be space battles. By the time interplanetary space voyages become commonplace, the idea that you ought to put shields or weapons on your space ship will seem laughable.

Space battles are a pretty silly concept, actually. No amount of shielding would prevent a high-powered laser from penetrating a hull. The laser battles would not only make no noise, they’d be invisible. And computer-guided laser turrets would never miss.

But my bet is that humans in the future will be less warlike, not more.

2. Similarity to Now

For the next couple hundred years, Earth will look pretty much the same as it does today. Skyscrapers will look the same. Roads will look the same. Cars will look the same, although they’ll use different fuel sources. People won’t suddenly start wearing shiny silver jumpsuits. And people will act basically the same way.

There will be a few noticeable differences, though. Solar panels will be ubiquitous. Rooftops in dense urban areas will be covered with vegetable gardens. And flat screens will be everywhere as the technology evolves to allow them to be painted onto unexpected surfaces.

For example, maybe you’ll press a button on your refrigerator and see a full-size image of what’s inside without having to open the door. (And then you’ll be able to live-stream the contents of your fridge to your cell phone, so you can see what you need to buy while strolling around Safeway.)

3. End of the Common Cold

We shouldn’t assume that viral infections will always be commonplace. In our age it’s a given that you’ll contract a cold or flu a couple times a year. Modern medical science doesn’t seem on track to change that. But there is much we could do right now, even without any advance in medical technology, to reduce viral infections simply by preventing their spread. It is normal these days for sick people to ignore their illnesses or to take a single sick-day and then rush back to work/school while they’re still contagious. If we changed our culture so infected people quarantined themselves better we’d see an immediate drop in infection rates.

And with a small advance in medicine we could do even better:

Imagine a drug – let’s call it Virulex – that you can take when you’re sick, and all it does it prevent you from spreading your virus to others. It has no major side effects. It doesn’t do anything else. It doesn’t stop fever or immunize you from future infections. But it can be added to other drugs, like NyQuil. It can even be added to food. Perhaps the FDA mandates that all over-the-counter medicines that target cold or flu must include Virulex.

Virulex isn’t far-fetched. All it must do is neutralize viruses in our mucus. It’s basically just a surgical mask in pill form: It prevents coughing fits and sneezes from spreading infection. Simple!

And yet the effects would be profound. Within a year or so, most common infections would simply vanish from the planet.

Give humankind 100 more years, and I bet we’ll have something like Virulex.

4. Immortality

We also shouldn’t assume that mortality is a necessary part of the human condition. The last half of the 20th century saw a revolution in pharmaceuticals. The next revolution in medicine, a revolution already begun, is in regenerative medicine. We now have hope that damage to nerves and organs, once thought irreparable, will one day be quite curable. And when it becomes clear that any one organ can be saved, the next obvious step is to save all of them, forever.

For all practical purposes, humans will stop aging at around 40. There will still be accidents and fluke illnesses, so given enough time everyone will die, but a lifespan of 1,000 years will be commonplace.

In our current age, we’re hampered by this awful notion that death is natural and that when old people die it shouldn’t be too upsetting – they more-or-less have it coming. I think that’s a horrible, mean-spirited, evil belief, and if you hold it you should be horse-whipped until you beg for mercy. Old people are a treasure, and it is a sin of the young to fail to value them, and a terrible sin at that. Let them live. Let them thrive. Let them live forever if they can.

5. Religion and Science

Within two hundred years, the majority of Americans will identify themselves as irreligious. Americans will become more scientifically literate. However, pseudo-science (superstition disguised as science) will continue to plague our species for a long time to come, probably forever.

6. Sex and marriage

Traditional marriage will continue to break down until it is seen as merely one option in a menu of options, as society adopts a consequentialist approach toward sexual morality: Arrangements between consenting adults are their own business as long as nobody is harmed.

7. Animal Rights

Animal welfare will finally become a mainstream issue. People won’t stop eating animals but they’ll treat farm animals much more humanely than we do today.

8. Off-world Exploration

It is very likely that we’ll colonize both the moon and Mars within a few hundred years.

It is unlikely that FTL travel is possible. Most of our space exploration will be confined to our own solar system. But as human lifespans increase in length and as our spaceships reach speeds at least a bit closer to the speed of light, humans will eventually visit other solar systems.

We will find microbial alien life forms multiple times. We will probably find life within our own solar system – if not existing lifeforms, then signs that they existed in the past.

But we will not mingle with other complex alien lifeforms, particularly not intelligent ones, for tens of thousands of years, if ever.

Earth is our one best home, and our off-world colonies will always pale in comparison.

The great struggle for our species is learning to forge a sustainable lifestyle for our kind on Earth, striking a balance between preserving the natural world and suiting the world to our wants and needs.

I expect we’ll succeed, but this struggle will continue to generate conflicts for some time to come. If there are major wars in the far future, they’ll be over diminishing resources firstly, and secondly over who gets to live on Earth and who doesn’t.

9. Lives Out of Sync

An interesting side-effect of enhanced longevity combined with close-to-light-speed-travel is that it will probably become normal for our lives to get out of sync with each other.

For example, suppose you go on a scientific mission to an exo-planet in a solar system a few light years away, and then you return to Earth. Only six months have passed from your point of view, but twenty years have passed for your mom and dad. Because of special relativity, any trip away from Earth at near light speed is also a trip into the future relative to people who remain on Earth. So when you get home from your trip your parents don’t necessarily look any different, but they’ve lived through a couple decades of stuff you know nothing about.

It will be interesting to see how people cope with massive gaps in their shared histories.

10. AI

Human-like AI is definitely possible, and as soon as we’ve attained it, it won’t be long until engineered minds surpass natural brains. I can’t imagine it will take humans longer than 500 years to accomplish this feat.

We’ve been looking at AI the wrong way. Computer scientists working individually or in small teams have tried to tackle the entire problem in isolation. Their focus has been to assemble software that can pass the Turing Test.

Cracking the problem will take more people and more resources than that – teams of scientists from multiple fields and from around the world, working in concert, backed by huge sums of money. Like with the Large Hadron Collider.

And the Turing Test is a bad test. It’s not how we measure human intelligence, or chimp intelligence, or raven intelligence, so why do we consider it a valid test of machine intelligence?

Machine intelligence, I suspect, will be comprised of several separate modules. It probably can’t fit in one program, but will require hundreds or thousands of programs working together. And perhaps it cannot be programmed at all, but must be evolved within a virtual world where large populations of machine intelligences compete for resources.

AI is the big wild card. The potential game changer.

If we eventually engineer beings who are superior to us in every regard – more intelligent, more durable, more efficient – faster, prettier, funnier, kinder, and happier – more curious, more empathetic, more compassionate, more charming – then what will become of us?

One possibility is that we’ll merge with our creations. We’ll opt to augment our organic brains with inorganic modules. And then eventually we’ll realize the human soul is really just a pile of information. The nature of the container is unimportant. The organic bits will disappear.

It’s very difficult to predict how all of this will impact our civilization, our culture, our psychology, and so on.

11. Art

How will art work in the future? I think it will change in major ways.

We see ourselves as so evolved, but civilization is still relatively young. Infantile, even. Modern civilization began with advent of agriculture in the Neolithic Revolution, only about 10,000 years ago. Written language is only half as old as that. And during that time the population of humans on the planet has been small compared to the population today.

With billions of people on the planet, after ten or twenty thousand years won’t everything that can possibly be said have already been said by somebody else? Won’t every poem have been written? Every melody? Won’t every dance have been danced?

We are buoyed and inspired by our history, but perhaps in the future our descendants will be drowned by theirs. History will overwhelm them, outshine them, undercut them, leave them no room for invention or originality.

The solution is a complete revamp of the way we think about intellectual property, and the end of copyright as we know it.

Ok, those are all my predictions for now.

 Posted by on February 21, 2013
Jan 312013
 

Any song about “a heart that beats as one, collectively unconsciously composed,” deserves attention. But then make that song upbeat and happy and more catchy than crack, and what do you get? “San Francisco” by The Mowglis. I’ve listened to it about 100 times over the past couple days. It makes you almost wish you lived in San Francisco just to have a song this cool about your home town. They even have a fun little video for it:

 Posted by on January 31, 2013
© 2014 Merrily Dancing Ape Site design info